We store cookies on your device to make sure we give you the best experience on this website. I'm fine with this - Turn cookies off
Switch to an accessible version of this website which is easier to read. (requires cookies)

Severn Barrage - No Barrier to the Barrage

March 9, 2020 9:07 PM
By Barry Cash in GLD Challenge magazine 2019-20

facebookNo Barrier to the Barrage

barrage page 24 (Rod Rainey & Associates Ltd)

(c) Rod Rainey & Associates Ltd

At last a proposal for a Severn Barrage that ticks all the boxes! The Severn estuary has the second highest rise and fall of tide in the world. For nearly 100 years, since 1925 in fact, people have been proposing that this huge flow of water could be used to generate electricity.


But there are problems, apart from the obvious one of cost. The tidal mudflats provide food for about 85,000 migrating birds and the RSPB has a million members. Anything that damages the environment will, understandably, attract huge opposition.


Fortunately Rod Rainey, visiting Professor of Engineering at Southampton University, has designed a barrage that will generate electricity cost effectively without reducing the tidal range. If he's right we could generate enough electricity to provide about 10% of the UK's needs without producing CO2 and have a negligible effect on wildlife - whether finned or feathered.

barrge page 18 (Rod Rainey & Associates Ltd)

(c) Rod Rainey & Associates Ltd


Most tidal generators use propellers in a duct. Prof. Rainey proposes an older technology, the breast shot water wheel. This is the system used in old fashioned water mills. The size of the wheels, 30 metres, means that fish and probably people (with a buoyancy aid) would pass through unharmed.


The really clever bit is that part way through the tidal cycle the generator is reversed and used as an electric motor to drive the wheel. Right now you're probably thinking this is crackers. Why use electricity from the grid to push water up a tidal estuary? The answer is to ensure the tidal reach is as far as the unobstructed river so the mudflats aren't reduced and the birds get their lunch.


Because the water pumped upstream flows back when the tide turns most of the energy is recovered. The actual loss in electricity generated is 4%. Genius! But how much would it cost and how does it compare to other methods of generation?


barrage nashpoint page 6 (Rod Rainey & Associates Ltd)

(c) Rod Rainey & Associates Ltd

Prof Rainey suggests an 18 Kilometre barrage from Nash point in Wales to Hurlestone point in Somerset.


The sea bed at this point is level bare rock ideal for piled foundations. These would be drilled through a template and then the supporting cradles floated out and sunk in place. The water wheels are then floated out and sunk onto the cradles. For maintenance the procedure is reversed.

barrage page 10 (Rod Rainey & Associates Ltd)

(c) Rod Rainey & Associates Ltd


The estimated cost of construction is £3.8bn. The expected power generated per annum is 35TWh (Terawatt hours). Hinkley Point C is now costing £19.6bn and will produce 28TWh/year, if it runs flat out, which it may not. The Rainey barrage offers 25% more power for 20% of the cost. Interesting. But what are the alternatives?


The Swansea Lagoon project offers 530GWh/yr at a cost of £1.3bn and has, rightly, been rejected by the Government. The Carrington combined cycle gas turbine station opened March 2017 and cost £710m. Estimated Energy generated 3.779 Gwh/yr*. But this produces CO2. If carbon capture and storage were used the cost would be much higher.


Comparing the projected construction costs per TWh/yr we get:
Rainey system £108.57m

Carrington CCGT £187.88m
Hinkley point C £700m

Swansea Lagoon £2,452.8m (over 22 times the cost of the Rainey barrage)


This is a pretty compelling case financially, not to mention the environmental benefits. Although tidal power is not continuous it is predictable. We can work out the times of high tide for hundreds of years into the future. There is no reason why a barrage couldn't generate power for a hundred years - much longer than conventional generators.


Given the urgent need to generate power without using fossil fuels this has got to be worth serious examination. I have written to my MP asking that the Government study the feasibility of prof . Rainey's proposal without delay. Why don't you write to your MP today?

*actual figure confidential but load factor for CCGT in 2016 was 48.8% according to government figures

By Barry Cash


Please join our Facebook Discussion of this article facebook


From GLD Challenge magazine 2019-20

barrage page 16 (Rod Rainey & Associates Ltd)

(c) Rod Rainey & Associates Ltd